John Laurinaitis (did you know that he’s the Executive Vice
President of Talent Relations and the
interim RAW GM?) had his job review on RAW this week and was about to be fired
when he was saved (inadvertently) by the arrival of the Undertaker. While
Laurinaitis spoke to the crowd and apologised for his actions, he was booed
mercilessly. This led me to wonder whether Laurinaitis deserves this vitriol.
A lot of people are comparing his feud with WWE Champion CM
Punk to the feud between Vince McMahon and Stone Cold Steve Austin but there are
a lot of differences between the two. The only similarity between Laurinaitis
and McMahon is that they don’t believe the current WWE Champion is the right
face for the company. With McMahon, he had to deal with a person who
was a beer drinker and hell raiser who was the complete opposite of the WWE
were during the late 80’s and early 90’s. With Laurinaitis, he is dealing with
a person who left the company with the WWE Championship and I feel that
Laurinaitis doesn’t understand why the fans are cheering a man who disrespected
the company by his actions. Not only that, but Punk’s actions had extremely
significant consequences involving the upper echelons of the company. In a way,
it can be argued that Punk’s actions over that time were far worse than Austin
ever did in his feud with McMahon. If you think about it, yes, Austin did
continually embarrass Vince McMahon but did Austin ever leave the company with
the WWE Championship? Did Austin ever deliver a promo in which he tore through
the entire company breaking “the fourth wall”?
John Laurinaitis’ actions since becoming interim RAW General
Manager haven’t really been that bad. Laurinaitis is not the head of the
company. He may have a lot of power in that company but he is effectively
middle management. Laurinaitis doesn’t have any beef with any of the wrestlers
except for Punk and, for the reasons that I mentioned earlier, that’s
understandable. Nor has Laurinaitis given any favouritism to any wrestlers
recently. I know that Laurinaitis was supportive of Kevin Nash, R-Truth and The
Miz last year, but that was to help him become interim RAW General Manager.
Since then, especially with The Miz, he hasn’t been supporting them as they are
no longer needed to help him. As for Dolph Ziggler, Laurinaitis has not shown
any favouritism towards him either. Ziggler is effectively a pawn in
Laurinaitis’ feud with Punk only because he doesn’t want Punk to be the WWE
Champion. The only person that has legitimate beef with Laurinaitis is Triple
H. It was obvious (not wrestling obvious where it’s all revealed as if we’re 5
year olds) that Laurinaitis was helping Miz and R-Truth distrupt things with
Triple H, which resulted in Laurinaitis getting his current position.
Laurinaitis is not as bad as people think. I mainly think
that the reason that the fans boo him is not only of his feud with arguably the
number one person in the company, it’s because of his real life role as
Executive Vice President of Talent Relations. It doesn’t help that he took over
from the extremely popular Jim Ross. One of his responsibilities is releasing
people and wishing them well in their future endeavours. He has released a lot
of good talent over the years (Mickie
James and Gail Kim come to mind as they’re two of the best female wrestlers
around at the minute) but that’s not entirely his fault. If the Creative
Department don’t have anything for you, no matter how talented you are, there
is a high chance that you will be released.
In summary, I say give Laurinaitis a chance. He has made
mistakes and is a jerk but what boss isn’t? At least he is man enough to admit
them and try to rectify them. Plus, he has given you some good moments and
matches over the last few months. How is that a bad thing?
No comments:
Post a Comment